Went to Reachout Missions Conference a couple of weekends ago. I found it a challenging weekend, but there was some stuff that was really good as well.
The Good
It was great to have Nick and Nat come along. Their enthusiasm was encouraging, and they showed a lot of interest in the displays of the other mission organisations. Nick connected really well with some of the other representatives at the reps retreat. Jodi bumped into a couple of friends that she went to primary school with. Those sorts of connections are always the best thing about Reachout.
I was really proud of our display. Mush made the comment that she thought it was the best it had ever looked. There were some things we did wrong though. All of the banners we have, have ‘Cornerstone Community’ written on the bottom of them. On other occasions it has not been clear by looking at our display who we actually were. This year we solved that by putting the banner on the table, so our name was almost at eye level. Additionally our table was as wide as our allocated space. This meant that we had a lot of table space to neatly and minimalist-ly present some of our printed media, but it also meant that we had nowhere to stand except in front of our display. There were rumours going around the display community that next year you can’t just register for a display, you have to actually apply and tell them what you want to do. I am keen on setting up a publican’s bar.
The input from the speakers was good. It was funny discussing the talks afterwards. It was almost always something like, “That was really good. I got a lot out of that.” To which person two replies, “Really!? I was really bored. I thought the other guy was much more insightful.” After which person one incredulously exclaims, “Really?! I didn’t like the first one. I thought the second was better.” And so on. It wasn’t just that we had different opinions and different experiences of the talks, it was that our opinions seemed always to be split. There was seldom (never?) a unanimous opinion.
The debrief was also really good. We had a good chance to talk things over, and discuss what worked and what didn’t. More on that later.
Oh, and the weather! Contrary to every prior experience I have had in Katoomba in August, the weather was really mild. That made it much more pleasant, especially in the auditorium.
The Bad
Consistent with the above comments about the split opinions about the talks, some (anonymous) people thought some of the talks were (intolerably – that might have been their own shallow reserve of tolerance) bad.
I was actually really disappointed by the Reps Retreat. It is a bit like Pete Vol says: No surprises. Maybe it was my fault for having misplaced expectations, but my unwavering summary is that it was not a retreat. It was a ruse (type “define:ruse” into google and read the first result; it gets it perfectly) to have a captive audience for rep briefing. It really made me appreciate the practical steps Cornerstone has taken to prioritise connecting and contributing, in things like the Gathering and Muster. At the reps retreat, as much time as possible was set aside for talks by the guys who were going to be talking at the conference. It was like two days of church, before a weekend of … church (in a bigger auditorium). I decided (and I stand by this decision) that this was not where I was at, and that I would be more enriched by spending some of the time reading, reflecting, and relaxing. I took this approach into the conference as well. It wasn’t all smooth sailing though. (Maybe my attitude should have gone in the ‘good’ section.)
The Ugly
This is where it gets a bit more personal. All of what follows in this section comes with the following disclaimer: how I feel about things is not necessarily correlated with external reality, and I acknowledge that a lot of it has to do with my own insecurities and compulsions, and as such what follows is mostly about me.
Having adopted what I think was a good approach to a program that I did not like, I began to feel the judgement of the other reps, especially the reps running the prorgram. It did cross my mind that I have a rebel complex, and it wouldn’t matter what the program was, I wouldn’t be able to participate. As I thought about it I decided this was not the case. Over the last few years I have become detached from contemporary church culture (partly intentional, and partly not), and I have tried to become more connected with contemporary ‘popular’ culture (as in the culture of the populace). I think that is part of what made me uncomfortable. I was experiencing church culture as an outsider. I knew it, and what made me feel uncomfortable (other than just being in a foreign culture) was the sense that the opinion of some of the other reps was that I shouldn’t be there. This is the problem in hypothetical scenario: If I was not a Christian, allowances would be made for me, and a hand of welcome and introduction would be extended to me. But because I am a Christian (and a ‘rep’ at that) I should know better. [End scenario].
It was interesting reflecting on the experience from a perspective of cultural theory. It would be interesting to think further about the ways that I (and/or Cornerstone) don’t fit in / upset church culture and the way the culture responds in order to protect itself. When I think about it in that light, it easier not to take it personally, because it is not these people being mean to me, it is just the culture responding the way cultures do. (Bring on the culture wars?) The thing with culture is that it is just the ‘atmosphere’, and in that atmosphere all of the things I do were deemed as wrong and the way I do them as incorrect. Maybe that’s how non-Christians feel at church?
I mentioned earlier that the debrief was really good. There are a lot of good things about going to Reachout, but it has its challenges too, and I may not be the best person to meet those challenges, at least not on my own. Every year that Cornerstone goes to Reachout, people afterwards comment that there are good reasons for going, but it is not worth the expense and the effort if we are going to continue doing it the way we are doing it. We said that this year too.
The thing that is good about it is connecting with people you already know who are a part of local churches and who are interested in mission. I am not the best person for this because I grew up in Queensland and I don’t have a long heritage of church connections. The reps retreat is a bit the same. Someone who has connections with people in the traditional mission organisations, who really enjoys connecting with that crowd and feels comfortable among them could really help me out. That person may not exist; that person might be you; I don’t know.
We were thinking about how Cornerstone could have a really Good time at Reachout, as well as achieving recruitment and PR goals. One of the strengths we have as an organisation is our culture. We thought about ways that we could bring that to Reachout. One idea we had was to see if Cornerstone’s Supper Club persona could run the cafe at Reachout. It might help to keep costs down for us too, if workers in the Supper Club don’t have to register for the conference. (They may not be able to get into the conference, but that’s probably not a bad thing
).
So it would be really great if next year, there was a whole mob of us there, having interesting conversations, and finding out the different ways that the Kingdom of God is growing in different areas, and ways that we can work with, help and serve each other.
I’ll see you there next year.